Apr 26
Rutgers University Study: Organic vs Conventional Produce
Green Living, Organic Gardening, vegetable gardening Add commentsOrganically grown produce provides our families with more nutrition than conventionally grown!
If you’re buying your food from commercial sources, such as a grocery store, take a look at the difference in the quality of conventional versus organic food.
| Food | Percentage ofDry Weight | Mill-equivalents per 100
grams Dry Weight |
Trace Elements Parts per Million Dry Weight | ||||||||
| Total Ash Mineral | Phosphorus | Calcium | Magnesium | Potassium | Iron | Manganese | Copper | ||||
| SNAP BEANS | |||||||||||
| Organic | 10.45 | 0.36 | 40.5 | 60 | 99.7 | 227 |
60 | 69 | |||
| Commercial | 4.04 | 0.22 | 15.5 | 14.8 | 29.1 | 10 | 2 | ||||
| CABBAGE | |||||||||||
| Organic | 10.38 | 0.38 | 60 | 43.6 | 148.3 | 94 |
13 | ||||
| Commercial | 6.12 | 0.18 | 17.5 | 13.6 | 33.7 | 20 |
2 | 0.4 | 0 | ||
| LETTUCE | |||||||||||
| Organic | 24.48 | 0.43 | 71 | 49.3 | 176.5 | 516 | 169 | 60 | 0.19 | ||
| Commercial | 7.01 | 0.22 | 16 | 13.1 | 53.7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |||
| TOMATOES | |||||||||||
| Organic | 14.2 | 0.35 | 23 | 59.2 | 148.3 | 1938 | 68 | 53 | 0.63 | ||
| Commercial | 6.07 | 0.16 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 58.8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| SPINACH | |||||||||||
| Organic | 28.56 | 0.52 | 96 | 203.9 | 23.7 | 1584 | 117 | 32 | 0.25 | ||
| Commercial | 12.38 | 0.27 | 47.5 | 46.9 | 24.6 | 49 |
1 | 0.3 | 0.02 | ||
Rutgers University Study Comparing Organic versus Commercially Grown Foods
| submitted by Dr. Gary Farr |

May 3rd, 2011 at 1:22 am
Wow that is a big difference it just shows organic is always best
November 12th, 2011 at 10:43 am
Can you provide a link to the actual table used above in this post? I’ve searched Rutger’s website but can’t locate it.
November 14th, 2011 at 2:11 pm
Do you have a link to view the entire chart? It looks like the picture above is only a portion of the information. Would be neat to see all the figures.
Thanks!
November 14th, 2011 at 2:56 pm
Thanks for this! I’ll pass it along.
November 14th, 2011 at 4:07 pm
That looks interesting, but the right side of the table is cut off. Do you have a link that would show the whole thing? and possibly more information about the study itself?
Thank you!
Amy
November 14th, 2011 at 5:55 pm
Yes, the chart seems to have cut off on our site. It has been a while since I posted this chart so I must find the actual study and source I have, however, in the meantime you can see the complete chart at http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/foodfacts/318. Thanks for following eco-gardeners.com and let me know if you have further questions/comments. -Annette